NutzWorld

Free Email Hot Products Search | Tickets Poker School 2008 NFL Draft Comparison Shop 

Home

News
Sports
Entertainment
Computing
Games
Men's Club
Women's Club

 Sponsors



Get Tickets To All Games at our Ticket Shop

News and Sports News Sports Opin

News and Sports
News
Sports
Opinions
Business and Finance
Money

Entertainment
Movies
Music
Television
Books

Horoscopes
Free Ecards
Jokes
Games

Travel

Shopping
Store HQ
Posters
Amazon Shop
eBay!

People
Chat
Personals
Community

Services
E-mail
Get Local
Calendar
Weather
Yellow Pages
White Pages
Maps
Directions
Real Estate
Free Web Pages

Guides
Autos
Food
Beer and Wine Guide

The Nutzworld Web Browser
Download Now!

 The Armchair Quarterback
With: Hezron Joseph

 

The Armchair Quarterback

April 17, 2008

A Way To Adjust The BCS Playoff

Congratulations to the Kansas Jayhawks for winning the 2008 NCAA men’s basketball championship with a 75-68 win over Memphis on April 7, 2008. Kansas proved themselves worthy by rallying from a nine-point deficit with just over two minutes left in the game. Combined with the football team going 11-1 this year, there is reason for optimism in Lawrence, Kansas.

I took careful note of some of the positive things about the selection process. They have a committee that selects the teams based on a set of criteria. They have a “true playoff” in the form of the tournament and the team that can win six games is crowned the champion. Could this format work in college football. I believe it can and in the following article, I will explain how this can be done.

I see that there are 11 conferences in major college football. I simply take the conference champion from each conference plus one at-large berth. The at-large berth can be decided by using the current BCS standings. Using the BCS standings, I will seed the teams 1-12. Below is how this would look:

  1. Ohio State Buckeyes (Big 10 champion)

  2. LSU Tigers (SEC champion)

  3. Virginia Tech Hokies (ACC champion)

  4. Oklahoma Sooners (Big 12 champion)

  5. Georgia Bulldogs (at-large berth)

  6. USC Trojans (PAC-10 champions)

  7. West Virginia Mountaineers (Big East Champion)

  8. Hawaii Warriors (WAC champion)

  9. BYU Cougars (Mountain West Champion)

  10. Central Florida Knights (Conference USA champion)

  11. Central Michigan Chippewa’s (MAC conference champion)

  12. Florida Atlantic Owls (Sun Belt conference champion)

In this scenario, I have seeded the teams based on BCS rankings. I feel that this eliminates the guesswork of who is ranked better. After all, this is the playoff and the best team will prevail. The top four seeds earn first round byes. In the first round, the higher seeded team will be the home team. This is how it will look: 

Florida Atlantic @ Georgia (12 Vs. 5 game). Central Michigan at USC (11 vs. 6 game). Central Florida @ West Virginia (10 vs. 7 game) and BYU at Hawaii (9 vs. 8 game).

The winners will advance to next week’s quarterfinals. I simulated the games on NCAA football 2008. The format will be the number one seed will play the lowest surviving seed. For illustration purposes, this is the quarterfinal match up.

BYU at Ohio State, West Virginia at LSU, USC at Virginia Tech and Georgia at Oklahoma.

The following Saturday, can be called semi-final Saturday. I will throw in the “television contract” factor, both games will be aired live For example, Georgia at Ohio State and USC is at LSU, the winners will play for the national title game, January 4 at New Orleans.

Armchair QB  Top 25 Poll

Final 2007 Armchair Poll

  1. LSU

  2. Kansas

  3. Southern California

  4. West Virginia

  5. Missouri

  6. Georgia

  7. Virginia Tech

  8. Ohio State

  9. Oklahoma

  10. Boston College

  11. Texas

  12. Tennessee

  13. BYU

  14. Arizona State

  15. Hawaii

  16. Michigan

  17. Illinois

  18. Auburn

  19. Florida

  20. Cincinnati

  21. Wisconsin

  22. Clemson

  23. Oregon

  24. Penn State

  25. Tulsa

The positive thing about my playoff proposal is that this can take 3 weeks. Consider the 2007 season—conference championship games were played on December 1, 2007. Starting December 8th the playoffs start. December 15, the quarterfinals take place; December 22nd the semi-finals take place. On January 4, 2008 the national championship takes center state. It eliminates the unnecessary layoff teams have to endure before playing their game. Second positive is that team are rewarded for a successful season by playing at home. This means additional revenue for the school and fans can enjoy their team. Third positive is that I think this proposal satisfies the bowl games. There have been many criticisms that bowl games lose their tradition. For example the Rose Bowl game--under my proposal, why can’t the second place team from the Big 10 and Pac 10 conferences earn a trip to Pasadena? How about the Sugar Bowl has the runner up from the SEC play a team for instance Kansas? I can apply the same to the Fiesta where Missouri can play Texas? The Orange Bowl can select The ACC or Big East runners up and play.

It is here where I feel a Bowl selection commissioner can be inserted to provide good quality matchups for teams that do not qualify for the playoff round. I find it hard to stomach viewing the Independence Bowl between 6-6 Colorado and 6-6 Alabama. In my view, those two teams deserve to be at home. If I was the selection team, I would install a rule that teams must be 7-5 or better to become “eligible”. Having said that, I would eliminate some of the lesser bowls because of poor fan base, TV ratings or poor attendance—Bowl games should be a reward for a good season, not mediocrity in a BCS conference. As an example here is a suggested bowl menu.

Rose—Arizona State vs. Michigan.

Sugar-Tennessee vs. Kansas

Fiesta—Missouri vs. Tulsa

Orange—Boston College vs. at-large team

I mention that with this system, I feel it reduces the bowl tie-ins. I don’t have an issue with a third place Big 10, Pac-10 etc team. I have a big concern where teams like Cincinnati and Tulsa have to play in smaller bowl games where also-rans in BCS conference play in the Chick-Fil-A, Sun, and Emerald bowl games. I know that this proposal can use some adjustments. I will be adjusting it and forwarding to Dr. Myles Brand the president of the NCAA for his review. I think it is time that the NCAA pulls it’ head out of the sand and work on a fair, equitable post-season playoff and bowl system.

 

NUTZMEDIA | ADVERTISE | CONTACT US | ABOUT NUTZMEDIA | PRIVACY POLICY | MISSION STATEMENT

© Copyright 1997-2008 NutzMedia.com
All Rights Reserved